🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where African descendants are paid to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The tide has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in October in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has developed since those days, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is commemorated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the recent season we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels emboldened to state that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. At the same time, far-right parties are expanding in the EU as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A drive to scrub Black history and experience from the records is in progress. One of the former president's early administrative commands targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the observance symbolises how little it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month entirely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an period that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an foundation that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out through the year (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not avoid governmental matters, and provides room for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the threats that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.