🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.